Permanent URL: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/uberon/references/reference_0000022
Status: intermediate draft
Authors and contributors:
Date: 2012
Document Type: ontology_design_pattern
Confusion over naming and homology can lead to errors when developing or using multi-species ontologies. The addition of taxon constraints in OWL can eliminate certain kinds of errors
We use two properties
These are expanded to in_taxon axioms
Often we can never be sure when a structure evolved, when it disappears, or when a structure that fits the same definition convergently evolves. Taxon constraints are not intended to convey precise sometimes controversial hypotheses - rather they convey conservative, relatively uncontroversial 'common knowledge' that is useful for error checking and building taxon modules.
The main ontology translation of NCBITaxonomy equates taxa with classes whose instances are organisms. The taxon constraints follow this model.
The NCBI taxonomy may not be precise enough for precise evolutionary hypotheses, but it should be sufficient for the kinds of broad taxon constraints useful for error checking.
Taxon constraints should be understood to refer to reference members of species. For example, 'digit 6 never_in_taxon Homo sapiens' is a valid taxon constraint despire the presence of polydactlyous humans.