New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Definition request: ceratotrichium #129
Comments
Other comment: it used to be thought that actinotrichia and ceratotrichia were composed of a 'horny' substance. This is incorrect and misleading (see Witten & Huysseune (2007) in Mendeley e.g., for more info. Note: Lepidotrichium is_a dermal bone; lepidotrichium is_a fin ray
|
Done! And more -- one thing leads to another… Paula On 10/10/12 10:14 PM, "Chris Mungall" <notifications@github.commailto:notifications@github.com> wrote: Can you review UBERON_4400001 in ext? I added this as a placeholder for the homology work required:
nice to have:
thanks! — |
I can take care of this later. A few extra quick questions. we lifted lepidotrichia from http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/VSAO_0000172 - no parthood axioms. Which of the above can we make all-some part_of relationships for? Should we request elastoidin from GO? Currently:
|
On 10/11/12 8:24 PM, "Chris Mungall" <notifications@github.commailto:notifications@github.com> wrote: I can take care of this later. A few extra quick questions. we lifted lepidotrichia from http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/VSAO_0000172 - no parthood axioms. Which of the above can we make all-some part_of relationships for? --not completely sure what you are asking (sorry). Might be easier to talk about on Friday call? Paula Should we request elastoidin from GO? Currently: --sent you an article referencing collagen composition of elastoidin. I don't know which type of collagen it is composed of.
— |
Thanks for the comments Paula. We didn't have time today on the call. Let me clarify. Our current structure is identical to the one from VSAO:
Note that "fin ray" is an exact syn for "lepidotrichium". The def is:
You said:
and
So it sounds like we should remove the exact syn and have something like:
Also, presumably fin rays are parts of fins. We don't have this at the moment, querying for fin parts will not return lepidotrichium |
Hi Chris, comments below. Thanks for making the changes --Paula On 10/12/12 6:06 PM, "Chris Mungall" <notifications@github.commailto:notifications@github.com> wrote: So it sounds like we should remove the exact syn yes - please remove fin ray as exact syn. It is frequently used a syn for all of those terms. and have something like:
--yes! please add this! fin rays are parts of fins. They function to strengthen the fins and the fin fold (fins like dorsal, anal, and caudal develop from the fin fold (also finfold). |
Fixed in revision 3671 to ext Notes:
|
Can you review UBERON_4400001 in ext? I added this as a placeholder for the homology work
required:
nice to have:
thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: